Furlough scheme: has employers’ NI been overclaimed?
The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW) has issued new guidance that describes two scenarios where employers using the furlough scheme may have inadvertently reclaimed secondary Class 1 NI twice when the scheme was first introduced. What’s the full story?
The Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (CJRS) is complex, but broadly employers pay a percentage of an employee's regular salary (at least 80% in 2020), subject to a cap, then reclaim the 80% element from HMRC. However, it also allows secondary Class 2 NI contributions to be reclaimed, as well as pension contributions under auto-enrolment. This has led to some scenarios where employers who claim the employment allowance (EA) of up to £4,000 per year inadvertently receiving furlough payments in respect of NI that is also relieved under the EA. The ICAEW has published detailed commentary on where this may have happened. In brief, an overclaim may occur where:
- EA claims were deferred until after the final claim month for the CJRS where the £4,000 was not absorbed in full during 2020/21; or
- EA claims were made at the beginning of the tax year where the full £4,000 was absorbed before July 2020.
Potentially affected business should carefully read the guidance and contact HMRC’s Employer Helpline on 0300 200 3200 if they think there is an issue.
Related Topics
-
Mandatory payrolling of benefits in kind delayed
The government has revised plans to introduce the mandatory payrolling of benefits in kind from 6 April 2027, which will now be limited to company cars, vans, fuel and medical benefits. What's the full story?
-
Personal vs company donation to charity
You’re an owner manager and want to make a £5,000 donation to a local charity. You’ve claimed income tax relief under the gift aid scheme for smaller amounts but could it be more tax efficient to make the donation via the company?
-
Uber loses VAT margin scheme appeal
The Court of Appeal has ruled that Uber cannot use the Tour Operators Margin Scheme (TOMS) when accounting for VAT on its ride-hailing services. The decision could have significant implications for businesses that act as intermediaries when supplying services to consumers. What was the dispute about?
This website uses both its own and third-party cookies to analyze our services and navigation on our website in order to improve its contents (analytical purposes: measure visits and sources of web traffic). The legal basis is the consent of the user, except in the case of basic cookies, which are essential to navigate this website.